Recent drought
conditions in the US have served as a reminder that food doesn't magically
appear on people's plates - an obvious fact, but one that many often
forget. Supply shortfalls naturally
elevate prices, and as the price of agricultural commodities increase, so does
the demand for fertilizer. Any forgone
food production today will require increased fertilizer use in the future, over
a multi-year time horizon. Potash has
the added benefit of helping to protect crops from stress, including
weather-related troubles.
As the CEO of the
industry's leading company, who also serves as the President of the International
Fertilizer Industry Association, Bill Doyle has access to an imposing pair of soapboxes; when he speaks, people listen. Though he is honest and plain-spoken, Doyle
uses conference calls in part to maneuver and negotiate with potash buyers, particularly China and India,
the only major countries that buy on contract, with volumes and prices agreed
upon before delivery (most buyers purchase their product as needed on the spot
market). He firmly stated on the
conference call, for example, that potash prices will be heading upward,
beginning now and extending for years to come.
But coming from Doyle this is not a passive prediction from someone
sitting on the sidelines, it's a pledge that Potash Corp will be increasing
prices. Considering the industry's
disciplined supply management, the newly diminished US crop, and the
relentlessly increasing demand from hungry people, it's a safe bet that forthcoming
price increases will stick.However, Potash Corp announced that its capital expansion program is now expected to cost $8.2 billion, up from past estimates of $7.7 billion, thanks to the perverse incentives of cost-plus construction contracts. While $500 million is a large number, even for a giant company, shareholders have a few reasons to at least feel ambivalent about the news. For one, the new supply is still expected to arrive on schedule. Second, with 78% of the capital expansions complete, there's a limit to future expenses. And most importantly, it's an indication of the substantial cost, and technical difficulty, of bringing on new supply. This is a plus for all incumbent producers, but is disappointing to would-be competitors that have never actually been in the challenging business of producing potash, and will not be immune themselves to the inflationary consequences of cost-plus work.
My original write-up on Potash Corp is here.
Disclaimer:
The host of this blog shall not be held responsible or liable for, and indeed
expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability for any losses, financial or
otherwise, or damages of any nature whatsoever, that may result from or relate
to the use of this blog. This disclaimer applies to all material that is posted
or published anywhere on this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment